buggerd_

Agentic AI · Pre-launch · Joining the waitlist

Your real users are already finding your bugs. buggerd fixes them.

For dev teams shipping web apps. buggerd is an agentic AI debugger that auto-detects the console errors, failed renders, and crashes your users hit in production — and turns each one into a reviewed pull request, so engineers stop spending Mondays triaging Sentry tickets.

Waitlist members: $5/month base fee waived during the trial. You only pay per merged fix.

How it works

Your real users find the bugs. buggerd turns them into reviewable pull requests automatically.

01

A user hits a bug

A console error fires. A component fails to render. A click takes seconds when it shouldn't. buggerd's lightweight script captures the failure, what the user was trying to do, and the state at the moment it broke.

02

buggerd diagnoses and writes the fix

It maps the minified error to your source via your source maps, identifies the failing code, and lands a candidate fix on a draft pull request.

03

Your CI verifies it. You merge.

Your existing CI runs the fix with your existing secrets. If it passes, the PR is ready. Review, merge, ship.

Compounding signal

The longer buggerd runs, the more of your production error surface is covered. Auto-captured errors and user reports feed the same fix pipeline — and if a regression resurfaces, buggerd catches it again.

Manual reports

When buggerd misses something, give your users a button.

Not every bug throws a console error. A button does the wrong thing silently. A feature feels slow. A workflow makes no sense. Drop the buggerd feedback widget on your site — your users tap, type what's broken, and submit. The report flows into the same fix pipeline as auto-captured errors.

  • Fully brandable — button color, shape, position, copy, icon, logo
  • Custom form fields — ask whatever you'd ask in a bug report
  • Route reports to the right repo and label automatically
  • Captures the page URL, user actions, and console state at submit time

Included in every plan. No separate add-on fee.

A few examples

acme.com
indigo-corp.io
studio.design
flux.app

Themable via JS config. Or hand us your design tokens and we'll match.

Good at

The boring 80%

  • Null-reference crashes (“Cannot read property X of undefined”)
  • Failed renders, hydration mismatches, broken error boundaries
  • Unhandled promise rejections from API calls
  • Slow interactions — clicks that hang, fetches that stall, long tasks blocking the main thread
  • Off-by-one and copy-paste bugs only real user data triggers
  • Edge cases your tests didn't cover but production found
  • Browser-specific bugs (Safari being Safari)

Not good at

The interesting 20%

Anything where buggerd doesn't have the information a human teammate would.

  • Architecture intent — where you want the code to go, not where it is
  • Work-in-progress code it wasn't briefed on
  • Domain knowledge that lives in someone's head
  • Visual / pixel bugs — it can't see the rendered page
  • Subjective UX — janky animations, awkward pacing, designs that aren't intuitive
  • Server / CDN / third-party API latency — buggerd flags these but can't fix them with code
  • Anything that needs a conversation with a stakeholder

buggerd fixes what's specified. It doesn't guess at what's intended.

Pricing

No per-seat fees. Hard monthly cap, no overages.

$5 / month base

+ per-fix usage on top. Healthy site? You pay $5.

Waitlist offer: $5/month base waived during the trial. You only pay for fixes you actually merge.

  • Hard monthly cap — buggerd stops when you hit it
  • No surprise overages, ever
  • Pay per merged PR, not per attempt
  • Cancel anytime — your fixes are normal git commits
Join the waitlist →

Frequently Asked Questions

The questions developers actually ask before signing up.

Reliability & accuracy

How does buggerd avoid shipping a bad fix?

Three guardrails, before merge — not after. Every fix is a draft PR, never auto-merged unless you explicitly opt in. Your own CI must pass on the fix branch before the PR is mergeable. And buggerd's GitHub App is scoped to opening PRs only — no admin, no Actions writes, no way to push directly to your default branch. The worst case is a closed PR. Your tests, your secrets, your call.

What kinds of bugs does it fail on?

The interesting 20%:

  • Intermittent or race-condition bugs without a reliable repro
  • Bugs that need domain knowledge not in the codebase
  • Architecture decisions
  • “It feels slow” / UX-shaped problems
  • Visual / pixel-level bugs — it can't see your site the way you can
  • Work-in-progress code it wasn't briefed on. If you have an in-flight refactor and buggerd doesn't know, it may “fix” the new code by reverting it to the older shape. Tell it what's changing, or pause it on those branches.

When buggerd hits one of these, it tells you and stops — it doesn't guess.

Will this break my production site?

No. Every fix lands as a pull request, never a direct push. You review and merge it the same way you would a human contributor's code. If you don't merge it, nothing changes in production.

What if my users hit a bug buggerd doesn't auto-detect?

Drop the buggerd feedback widget on your site. It's a small in-page button — fully brandable to match your design — that opens a form your users can use to report bugs the AI didn't auto-catch: features that feel slow, buttons that do the wrong thing silently, workflows that don't make sense.

Submitted reports flow into the same fix pipeline as auto-captured errors. You can customize:

  • Button color, shape, position, text, icon, logo
  • Which form fields appear
  • Which repo and label the report routes to

Included in every plan.

Does this replace my developers?

No. buggerd handles the boring 80% — flaky tests, dependency churn, lint noise, copy-paste bugs — so your developers spend their time on the interesting 20%: architecture, product, and the bugs that actually require judgment. Teams using buggerd don't shrink; they ship more.

Privacy

Does my code get used to train AI models?

No. Your code is not used to train our models or any third-party model. We're moving to Anthropic's zero-retention enterprise terms; until that contract is in place, default Anthropic API terms apply today (Anthropic does not train on API traffic). Code submitted during a debug session is deleted within 30 days regardless.

What does your script capture from my users?

Only what's needed to diagnose the bug: the error message, the stack trace, the URL, the browser, and a small breadcrumb trail of the user's last few actions (clicks, page navigations).

It does not capture form input values, keystrokes, page screenshots, network response bodies, or any element you mark data-buggerd-private. PII scrubbing rules are configurable per project. We are not a session-replay tool.

Security

Will it touch my database, customer data, or secrets?

buggerd uses a minimum-privilege GitHub App scoped to exactly four permissions: contents:write and pull_requests:write (so it can open and update PRs), metadata:read and checks:read (so it can read your CI status). It has no actions:write, no admin permissions, and no credentials to your database, environment variables, third-party APIs, or production runtime. The only write actions are pushing the fix branch and opening or updating a PR.

Then how does it verify a fix without my secrets?

It uses your existing CI. buggerd opens a draft pull request with a candidate fix; your GitHub Actions runs the same tests, with the same secrets, in the same environment it always has. buggerd reads the result and iterates if needed.

  • buggerd never sees your secrets — they stay where they always were, in your CI.
  • No new attack surface — the only thing buggerd can do to your repo is open a PR.
  • Tradeoff: latency. A CI run is 3–15 min. If buggerd needs to iterate, a fix can take 30–45 min. For overnight failures and dependency bumps, async is fine.
  • Tradeoff: your CI minutes. Each iteration uses some of your Actions allowance. We cap iterations per fix and skip the slow path for cheap checks (typecheck, lint, unit tests).
Can I just have it auto-merge fixes? I don't want to review PRs.

Yes. Auto-merge is an opt-in mode you turn on per project. If your CI passes, the fix ships — no review step. Your tests are the safety net.

It is off by default and we don't recommend it for apps with real customers in them. But for side projects, internal tools, and “I just want this thing to keep working” sites, it's there for the lazy use case it was built for.

You can also flip the opposite direction and turn on Hardened mode — same fix loop plus an automated security review (dependency scan, secret detection, taint analysis, security-tuned LLM reading the diff) before the PR opens. The default is the middle.

Pricing & spend safety

Can a runaway AI agent rack up a huge bill?

No. Every project has a hard spend cap. When it's reached, buggerd pauses and emails you. There is no overage charge and no way to disable the cap from inside the product.

What if you shut down or get acquired?

The fixes buggerd generates are normal git commits in your normal repo. There is no lock-in. If we disappear tomorrow, your codebase keeps working exactly as it did before.

Compatibility & scope

Do I need source maps in production?

Yes. buggerd uses your source maps to translate minified stack traces back into actual code in your repo. You can either upload them on each deploy (we provide a CLI) or host them privately and grant buggerd read access. Without source maps, the AI can't locate the failing code — so this is a hard requirement.

Where is my code processed?

US only — EU on roadmap. Code does not leave that region. On-prem and self-host are not yet supported.

Will your script slow down my site?

No. The buggerd snippet loads asynchronously and only runs work when an error fires — there is no continuous background activity. Bundle size and load impact are published targets in our docs and we treat regressions on either as P0 bugs.

How is this different from Sentry, LogRocket, or Datadog RUM?

They tell you. buggerd fixes it.

Those tools capture the same browser errors and surface them in a dashboard. Then it's on your team to triage, reproduce, prioritize, and ship a fix — typically days or weeks later. buggerd does the triage, the diagnosis, and writes the fix as a PR automatically. The dashboard becomes optional.

If you already use Sentry, keep it. We don't replace your observability stack — we replace the triage queue downstream of it. Sentry integration is on the roadmap so you don't have to install two scripts.

How is this different from pasting code into ChatGPT or Cursor?

A chat model reads code and writes plausible-looking patches. buggerd starts from the real error your real user hit, and only opens a PR after your CI verifies the fix demonstrably passes. The PR includes the test that proves it.

Didn't see your question?

Stop fixing the boring stuff.

Join the waitlist. Get the $5/month base fee waived during the trial.